Question 1
Adam, a malicious hacker has successfully gained unauthorized access to the Linux system of
Umbrella Inc. Web server of the company runs on Apache. He has downloaded sensitive documents and database files from the computer. After performing these malicious tasks, Adam finally runs the following command on the Linux command box before disconnecting. for (( i = 0;i<11;i++ )); do dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda && dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda done
Which of the following actions does Adam want to perform by the above command?
I agree with the suggested answer C. The command sequence provided is a classic destructive anti-forensics technique designed to overwrite the primary storage device multiple times to prevent data recovery.
Reason
Option C is correct because the bash loop runs 11 times, executing two dd commands per iteration. The command dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda fills the first IDE hard drive (/dev/hda) with random data, while dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda overwrites it again with null bytes (zeros). This multi-pass wiping ensures that the original documents, database files, and system logs are effectively destroyed and cannot be easily recovered by forensic tools.
Why the other options are not as suitable
- Option A is incorrect because the of= (output file) parameter points to the hard drive itself, not a remote location or image file; it is overwriting, not copying.
- Option B is incorrect because while logs will be deleted as a byproduct of wiping the entire disk, the command is far broader than just targeting log files.
- Option D is incorrect because /dev/random and /dev/zero do not contain viral code; they generate entropy and null characters respectively, which are used for data destruction, not infection.
