Question 1
Which of the following are advantages of Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS)?
I agree with the suggested answer C, though it relies on the context provided in the community discussion since the original question body was truncated. Based on the clarified options, statements B, D, and E represent classic advantages of a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS), such as providing visibility into traffic and being generally cost-effective compared to widespread HIDS deployment.
Reason
The correct option (B, D, and E) is right because: B (Provide insight into network traffic) is a primary function of NIDS, allowing administrators to see what is traversing the wire. D (Provide logs for other security measures) highlights how NIDS data feeds into SIEMs and incident response forensics. E (Inexpensive to manage) refers to the fact that a single NIDS sensor can monitor hundreds of hosts, making it more cost-effective and easier to maintain than installing and managing individual agents on every single host (HIDS).
Why the other options are not as suitable
- Option A is incorrect because it includes statement A (Analysis of encrypted traffic); NIDS typically cannot inspect the payload of encrypted packets without a decryption proxy or man-in-the-middle solution, making this a known limitation rather than an advantage.
- Option B is incorrect because it includes statement A, which is a technical limitation of NIDS, not an advantage.
- Option D is incorrect because it includes statement A and excludes statement E, failing to capture the management efficiency advantage inherent to network-based detection.