[ServiceNow] CIS-SIR - CIS Security Incident Response ​ Exam Dumps & Study Guide

Free [ServiceNow] CIS-SIR - CIS Security Incident Response ​ Practice Questions Preview

• Question 1

  What makes a playbook appear for a Security Incident if using Flow Designer?

  • A. Actions defined to create tasks
  • B. Trigger set to conditions that match the security incident
  • C. Runbook property set to true
  • D. Service Criticality set to High

  Correct Answer: B

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer, which is B. Trigger set to conditions that match the security incident.
  
  Reasoning: The core reason a playbook appears for a Security Incident when using Flow Designer is that the trigger conditions defined within the Flow Designer workflow match the attributes or characteristics of the Security Incident. This ensures that the appropriate playbook is initiated for relevant incidents.
  The ServiceNow documentation supports this, indicating that playbooks are designed to be triggered based on conditions. The discussion also references the "Add Playbook action" which implicitly reinforces the idea that the standard behavior is trigger-based unless manually overridden.
  
  Reasons for not choosing other options:

  • A. Actions defined to create tasks: While actions within a playbook are important for its functionality, the mere presence of actions doesn't dictate when the playbook will appear. Actions execute *after* the playbook is triggered.
  • C. Runbook property set to true: There is no standard "Runbook property" that directly controls the appearance of a playbook in relation to a Security Incident. Playbooks are activated based on trigger conditions, not a simple on/off switch.
  • D. Service Criticality set to High: Service Criticality can be a *part* of the trigger condition (i.e., a playbook might trigger only for high-criticality services), but it is not the sole determinant. The trigger conditions encompass a wider range of incident attributes.

• Question 2

  What is the purpose of Calculator Groups as opposed to Calculators?

  • A. To provide metadata about the calculators
  • B. To allow the agent to select which calculator they want to execute
  • C. To set the condition for all calculators to run
  • D. To ensure one at maximum will run per group

  Correct Answer: D

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer, D.
  The purpose of Calculator Groups is to ensure that, at most, one calculator within the group will run.
  This is useful when you have multiple calculators that perform similar functions or address the same risk, but you only want one of them to execute in a given situation.
  Here's a detailed breakdown of why option D is correct and why the others are not:

  • A. To provide metadata about the calculators: This is incorrect. While calculators might have associated metadata, the primary function of Calculator Groups is not to provide this metadata. Metadata can exist independently of the group.
  • B. To allow the agent to select which calculator they want to execute: This is incorrect. Calculator Groups are intended to automate the selection process based on predefined conditions, not to provide manual selection options for an agent.
  • C. To set the condition for all calculators to run: This is incorrect. Calculator Groups do not set a common condition for *all* calculators in the group to run. The purpose is to ensure only *one* runs, based on individual conditions evaluated within the group's context.
  • D. To ensure one at maximum will run per group: This is correct. Calculator Groups are designed to manage the execution of calculators such that only one calculator within the group executes. This prevents redundant calculations or conflicting results.

  Therefore, option D is the most accurate description of the purpose of Calculator Groups.

• Question 3

  The following term is used to describe any observable occurrence: __________.

  • A. Incident
  • B. Log
  • C. Ticket
  • D. Alert
  • E. Event

  Correct Answer: E

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
  The suggested answer is E. Event.
  Reasoning:
  An event, in the context of security and system monitoring, is broadly defined as any observable occurrence within a system or network. This aligns perfectly with the question's description of "any observable occurrence." Events can range from routine operations to potential security incidents. Common examples include user logins, file accesses, system startups, and network connections. Identifying these events is a key component of security monitoring, logging, and incident response.
  Why other options are not suitable:
  

  • A. Incident: An incident is a specific type of event that signifies a security breach or a violation of security policies. It's a more serious and consequential occurrence than a general event.
  • B. Log: A log is a record of events that have occurred. It's a repository of event data, not the event itself.
  • C. Ticket: A ticket is a record or request for assistance related to a problem or incident. It is not the occurrence itself.
  • D. Alert: An alert is a notification triggered by a specific event or condition that requires attention. Alerts are generated based on events, but they aren't the event itself.

  Therefore, "Event" is the most accurate and comprehensive term to describe any observable occurrence.
  

  Citations:

  • Event (computing), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(computing)
  • NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-61r2.pdf

• Question 4

  The severity field of the security incident is influenced by what?

  • A. The cost of the response to the security breach
  • B. The impact, urgency and priority of the incident
  • C. The time taken to resolve the security incident
  • D. The business value of the affected asset

  Correct Answer: D

  Explanation:

  The AI assistant suggests that the answer is D: The business value of the affected asset.
  
  Reasoning:
  The severity of a security incident is primarily determined by the impact it has on the organization. The business value of the affected asset directly correlates to this impact. A breach affecting a critical, high-value asset will naturally be considered more severe than one affecting a less important asset. This aligns with risk management principles where prioritizing resources towards protecting valuable assets is paramount.
  Furthermore, several frameworks and standards, such as NIST and ISO 27001, emphasize the importance of asset valuation in determining security controls and incident response priorities. Incidents affecting high-value assets warrant a more urgent and comprehensive response due to the potential for significant financial, reputational, or operational damage.
  
  Reasons for not choosing the other answers:

  • A. The cost of the response to the security breach: While the cost of response is a factor considered *after* an incident, it doesn't *influence* the initial severity level. Severity is determined before the response is initiated.
  • B. The impact, urgency, and priority of the incident: While impact is definitely a factor to determine severity, urgency and priority are consequences of the severity assessment rather than direct influencers of the severity itself.
  • C. The time taken to resolve the security incident: Resolution time is a metric for incident handling efficiency, not a determinant of initial severity. A high-severity incident will demand faster resolution, but the time taken doesn't define the severity level itself.

• Question 5

  The Risk Score is calculated by combining all the weights using __________.

  • A. an arithmetic mean
  • B. addition
  • C. the Risk Score script include
  • D. a geometric mean

  Correct Answer: A

  Explanation:

  The AI assistant agrees with the suggested answer A (an arithmetic mean).
  Reasoning: The risk score is indeed calculated by combining weights using an arithmetic mean. This method effectively averages the various risk factors to produce an overall risk score. As supported by the ServiceNow documentation and corroborated by various online discussions, the arithmetic mean is used to calculate risk based on factors like CI Business Impact, Security Incident Business Impact, Security Incident Priority, Security Incident Severity, and User Business Impact.
  Reasons for not choosing the other options:

  • B. Addition: While addition is involved in calculating the arithmetic mean (summing the weighted values), the final score is obtained by dividing this sum by the number of factors, making "addition" incomplete.
  • C. The Risk Score script include: This option refers to the technical implementation within ServiceNow, not the mathematical method of calculation. The script include *contains* the logic, but isn't the method itself.
  • D. A geometric mean: A geometric mean is more appropriate when dealing with multiplicative relationships or rates of change, which is not the case for combining risk factors in a typical risk score calculation.

  Citations:

  • ServiceNow Risk Management Documentation, [ServiceNow Documentation URL - Placeholder, actual URL needed]
  • Online Forum Discussion on ServiceNow Risk Scores, [Forum Discussion URL - Placeholder, actual URL needed]

• Question 6

  What are two of the audiences identified that will need reports and insight into Security Incident Response reports? (Choose two.)

  • A. Analysts
  • B. Vulnerability Managers
  • C. Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
  • D. Problem Managers

  Correct Answer: AC

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer of A and C.
  Reasoning: Security incident response reports are crucial for both analysts, who require detailed information to investigate and resolve incidents, and the CISO, who needs a high-level overview to understand the organization's security posture and make strategic decisions. The discussion summary accurately reflects that Analysts and the CISO are explicitly identified as key reporting audiences.
  Reasons for not choosing other answers:
  

  • B. Vulnerability Managers: While vulnerability managers benefit from security incident information, they are not the primary audience for general incident response reports. Their focus is more on proactively identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
  • D. Problem Managers: Problem managers are interested in identifying the root causes of recurring incidents. While incident reports can contribute to problem management, they are not the primary audience for incident response reports themselves.

• Question 7

  What three steps enable you to include a new playbook in the Selected Playbook choice list? (Choose three.)

  • A. Add the TLP: GREEN tag to the playbooks that you want to include in the Selected Playbook choice list
  • B. Navigate to the sys_hub_flow.list table
  • C. Search for the new playbook you have created using Flow Designer
  • D. Add the sir_playbook tag to the playbooks that you want to include in the Selected Playbook choice list
  • E. Navigate to the sys_playbook_flow.list table

  Correct Answer: BCD

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer of BCD.
  
  Reasoning: The process of including a new playbook in the "Selected Playbook" choice list involves several key steps within the ServiceNow platform. These steps ensure that the playbook is correctly identified and available for selection in relevant workflows, particularly those related to Security Incident Response (SIR).
  
  Here's a breakdown of why each selected option is correct:

  • B. Navigate to the sys_hub_flow.list table: This table is crucial because it lists all flows, including playbooks created in Flow Designer. Accessing this table is a necessary first step to locate and modify the desired playbook.
  • C. Search for the new playbook you have created using Flow Designer: Locating the specific playbook within the sys_hub_flow table is essential to ensure you are working with the correct item. Searching by name or other identifiers helps to pinpoint the newly created playbook.
  • D. Add the sir_playbook tag to the playbooks that you want to include in the Selected Playbook choice list: This is a critical step for ensuring that the playbook appears in the "Selected Playbook" choice list, particularly within the Security Incident Response context. The 'sir_playbook' tag acts as a filter, allowing the system to identify and display relevant playbooks in the selection list.

  Why the other options are incorrect:

  • A. Add the TLP: GREEN tag to the playbooks that you want to include in the Selected Playbook choice list: While TLP (Traffic Light Protocol) tags are used for information sharing and classification, they are not directly related to including a playbook in the "Selected Playbook" choice list. TLP tags serve a different purpose related to controlling the dissemination of sensitive information, as explained in the SANS Institute resource and DHS guidance.
  • E. Navigate to the sys_playbook_flow.list table: While this table might exist or sound plausible, the correct table to manage flows and playbooks in ServiceNow is the sys_hub_flow table. The sir_playbook tag is linked to flows within this table, not the suggested sys_playbook_flow table.

• Question 8

  Which improvement opportunity can be found baseline which can contribute towards process maturity and strengthen costumer’s overall security posture?

  • A. Post-Incident Review
  • B. Fast Eradication
  • C. Incident Containment
  • D. Incident Analysis

  Correct Answer: A

  Explanation:

  The AI concurs with the suggested answer of A. Post-Incident Review.
  
  Reasoning: The question explicitly asks for an improvement opportunity that contributes to process maturity and strengthens the customer's overall security posture. A Post-Incident Review (PIR) directly addresses this by identifying areas for improvement in incident response processes, security controls, and overall security strategy after an incident has been resolved. PIRs help organizations learn from past incidents, prevent future occurrences, and enhance their security posture proactively. This aligns perfectly with the objectives of process maturity and strengthened security.
  
  Why other options are incorrect:

  • B. Fast Eradication: While fast eradication is important, it's primarily focused on minimizing the impact of an ongoing incident. It doesn't necessarily contribute directly to process maturity in the same way a PIR does. Eradication is a reactive measure, whereas a PIR leads to proactive improvements.
  • C. Incident Containment: Similar to eradication, containment is a critical part of incident response, but it's focused on limiting the scope of an incident. It is a reactive measure that does not necessarily offer much learning for the future
  • D. Incident Analysis: Incident Analysis is important, it is still a real-time activity dedicated to understanding the incident to assist with containing and eradicating it. Incident Analysis without review offers only a snapshot of a single situation; review is what aggregates learning to improve security posture and resilience to prevent future incidents and improve response.

  A Post Incident Review is the best improvement opportunity that contributes towards process maturity and strengthens customer’s overall security posture.

• Question 9

  What is the fastest way for security incident administrators to remove unwanted widgets from the Security Incident Catalog?

  • A. Clicking the X on the top right corner
  • B. Talking to the system administrator
  • C. Can't be removed
  • D. Through the Catalog Definition record

  Correct Answer: D

  Explanation:

  The suggested answer (D) is correct.
  The fastest way for security incident administrators to remove unwanted widgets from the Security Incident Catalog is through the Catalog Definition record. This approach allows for the deactivation or modification of widgets, effectively removing them from the catalog's offerings.
  Here's why:

  • Deactivating the widgets from the catalog item is the correct approach.
  • Navigating to Security Incident > Catalog & Knowledge > Maintain Catalog Items, then selecting and deactivating unwanted items will remove them from the catalog.

  The other options are not the fastest or most effective methods because:

  • Clicking the 'X' on the top right corner only removes the widget from the current view, it does not remove it from the catalog itself.
  • Talking to the system administrator might lead to the right approach, but it is not the fastest way. A security incident administrator should have the permission and know-how to manage catalog items.
  • The widgets can be removed, so "Can't be removed" is incorrect.

  Reasoning: The most efficient and direct method for a security incident administrator to manage widgets in the Security Incident Catalog involves modifying the Catalog Definition record. This record provides control over which widgets are available in the catalog. Deactivating or modifying a widget's record ensures it's no longer offered, thus effectively removing it from the catalog.

  Citations:

  • ServiceNow Documentation - Maintain Catalog Items, https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/vancouver-security-management/page/product/security-incident-response/task/deactivate-catalog-items.html

• Question 10

  Select the one capability that retrieves a list of running processes on a CI from a host or endpoint.

  • A. Get Network Statistics
  • B. Isolate Host
  • C. Get Running Processes
  • D. Publish Watchlist
  • E. Block Action
  • F. Sightings Search

  Correct Answer: C

  Explanation:

  The AI agrees with the suggested answer.
  The suggested answer is C: Get Running Processes.
  The reason for choosing this answer is that the "Get Running Processes" capability is designed to retrieve a list of currently running processes from a host or endpoint within a Configuration Item (CI) in ServiceNow. This function is crucial for identifying potentially malicious or unauthorized processes that may be active on a system. By obtaining a list of running processes, security incident response teams can analyze the processes for suspicious activity, compare them against known malware signatures, and take appropriate remediation actions.
  The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:

  • A. Get Network Statistics: This retrieves network-related data, not a list of processes.
  • B. Isolate Host: This action isolates a host from the network, it doesn't list running processes.
  • D. Publish Watchlist: This publishes a list of items to be monitored, not running processes.
  • E. Block Action: This blocks a specific action or process, rather than listing all running processes.
  • F. Sightings Search: This searches for sightings of indicators of compromise, and doesn't return a list of processes.

  Citations:

  • ServiceNow Documentation, https://www.servicenow.com/